Peer Review Process
The Journal of Cognitive Computing and Cybernetic Innovations (JCCCI) adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer-review process to ensure the publication of high-quality, original, and impactful research. The journal follows a double-blind peer-review methodology, where both the authors' and reviewers' identities are kept confidential to maintain objectivity and fairness.
- Initial Screening:
Submitted manuscripts are first assessed by the editorial team for adherence to the journal's focus, scope, and formatting requirements. Manuscripts that do not meet basic standards or fall outside the journal's scope are returned to the authors. - Assignment to Reviewers:
Manuscripts passing the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent experts in the relevant field. Reviewers are carefully selected based on their expertise to provide informed evaluations. - Reviewer Evaluation:
Reviewers assess the manuscript for originality, methodological rigor, technical clarity, relevance, and contribution to the field. They provide detailed feedback and recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection. - Author Revisions:
Authors are required to respond to reviewers' comments and revise their manuscripts accordingly. Revised submissions undergo further review, if necessary, to ensure all concerns have been adequately addressed. - Editorial Decision:
Based on reviewers’ feedback and the editor's assessment, a final decision is made to accept, request further revisions, or reject the manuscript. - Publication:
Accepted manuscripts are edited and prepared for publication, ensuring clarity, consistency, and adherence to the journal's standards.
The entire peer-review process is designed to uphold academic integrity, encourage constructive feedback, and maintain the quality and credibility of research published in JCCCI.
